My Response to Op-ed:

The op-ed written by Victor Mather provides a well-researched and informative argument on how the evolution of the three-point shot in the NBA has changed the NBA for the better. The writer does an excellent job of tracing the history of the three-point shot and its impact on the game of basketball. One of the key points the article makes is that the three-point shot was initially seen as a gimmick and was not widely accepted by players, coaches, or fans. This is an important point because it highlights how the game has evolved over time and how new ideas and strategies can take time to be accepted.

The article also does an excellent job of exploring the players and coaches who helped popularize the three-point shot. For example, the writer notes that players such as Larry Bird and Reggie Miller were early adopters of the three-point shot and helped to demonstrate its effectiveness on the court. Additionally, coaches such as Don Nelson and Mike D'Antoni were early advocates of the three-point shot and helped to develop offensive systems that took advantage of its potential. One of the most significant impacts of the three-point shot has been on the overall style of play in the NBA. Prior to the widespread adoption of the three-point shot, the game was largely centered around a traditional, inside-out style of play, with big men dominating the post and guards working to create space for mid-range jump shots. However, with the advent of the three-point shot, the game has become more spread out, with players and teams focusing on creating space and opportunities for long-range shots.

This change in style has led to a greater emphasis on small ball lineups, with teams focusing on speed and mobility over size and strength. Additionally, it has led to a greater emphasis on individual skill and versatility, with players needing to be able to shoot from long range, handle the ball effectively, and play multiple positions on the court. One point the article could have explored in more depth is the impact of the three-point shot on other aspects of the game. While the article notes that the three-point shot has changed the way teams play offense, it does not delve into the impact the three-point shot has had on defense or other aspects of the game. For example, the emphasis on the three-point shot may have made some players less effective on defense, as they are now required to cover more ground on the court.

Another point the article could have explored in more depth is the impact of the three-point shot on player development. The emphasis on the three-point shot has led to the development of a new type of player, one who is versatile and can shoot from long range. However, this emphasis may also be limiting the development of other aspects of the game, such as post play and mid-range shooting. Despite these potential drawbacks, the three-point shot has undoubtedly had a positive impact on the game of basketball. The three-point shot has opened up new offensive strategies and has made the game more exciting for fans. Additionally, it has led to increased competitiveness and has forced players and coaches to constantly adapt and evolve their game.

Overall, I tend to agree with the article's argument that the three-point shot has been a game-changer in the NBA. While there are certainly some potential drawbacks to the emphasis on the three-point shot, the benefits far outweigh the costs. As players and coaches continue to adapt to these changes, it will be interesting to see how the game continues to evolve in the years to come.