Blog Response W3

Expert Op-ed Link:

https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/nba-insider-tom-haberstroh/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-confusing-analytics-nbas-3-point

 

Quick Summary Of Op-ed Link:

This article argues that the increasing reliance on the 3-point shot in basketball is having a negative impact on the sport, as it has led to a decrease in ball movement, player movement, and overall strategy. He also notes that the increased emphasis on the 3-point shot has led to a decrease in the importance of other skills, such as mid-range shooting and post play.

 

My Response to Op-ed:

 

In his op-ed, Tom Haberstroh argues that the rise of the 3-point shot in the NBA has led to a decrease in overall scoring and a less exciting product for fans. He presents statistics to support his claim, such as the fact that the league's overall shooting percentage has decreased since the introduction of the 3-point shot, and that teams are taking more 3-pointers than ever before. Haberstroh also argues that the increased emphasis on 3-point shooting has led to a decrease in ball movement and a lack of variety in offensive strategies.

While Haberstroh makes some valid points, there are also several reasons why the 3-point shot has had a positive impact on the game of basketball. One of the main benefits of the 3-point shot is that it has made the game more accessible to fans all over the world. With the rise of the internet and social media, basketball fans can now watch games from anywhere in the world and share their passion for the sport with others. The 3-point shot has also allowed for a wider variety of players to succeed, as smaller, more agile players who may not have been able to compete in the old style of basketball can now make a significant impact on the game. Another advantage of the 3-point shot is that it has made the game more strategic. Coaches and players must constantly adjust their game plans based on the strengths and weaknesses of their opponents. This has led to a greater emphasis on team play and ball movement, as teams must work together to create open 3-point shots. While Haberstroh argues that the increased emphasis on 3-point shooting has led to a decrease in ball movement, the reality is that teams still need to move the ball effectively in order to create good 3-point shots. When executed properly, the 3-point shot can be a beautiful and exciting aspect of the game.

Perhaps most importantly, the 3-point shot has made basketball more exciting and enjoyable to watch. Before the advent of the 3-point shot, basketball was a game that was dominated by big men who played close to the basket. While there were certainly exciting moments and great players during this era, the game itself was often slow-paced and lacked the kind of drama and excitement that we see in modern basketball. The 3-point shot has changed all of that. It has opened up the game and allowed for a wider variety of players to succeed. And perhaps most importantly, it has made basketball more entertaining for fans. There is nothing quite like the excitement of a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to win a game, or the thrill of watching a player get hot and hit several 3-pointers in a row.

In conclusion, while there are certainly valid criticisms of the 3-point shot in basketball, it is clear that it has had a positive impact on the game overall. From making the game more accessible to fans all over the world, to opening up new opportunities for players to succeed, to making basketball more exciting and enjoyable to watch, the 3-point shot has become an integral part of the sport. While there may be debates about how the 3-point shot has changed the way basketball is played, it is hard to deny its importance and the role it has played in shaping the modern game. As basketball continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how the 3-point shot and other innovations continue to impact the sport and its players.